Search for: "GREYHOUND LINES, INCORPORATED"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2021, 2:24 pm
In addition to the chapter describing the list of firms in the industry, the book also incorporates two separate chapters focusing on many of the key players. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
A corporation is domiciled only in the state where it is incorporated (Sease v Central Greyhound Lines, Inc., of New York, 306 NY 284 [1954]). [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
Here's how they explained it:The Board’s joint-employer doctrine is best understood as always having incorporated the common-law concept of control—as the Supreme Court’s one decision involving the doctrine confirms. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
In the previous blog, Start Preparing Your Motion Because with These Responses You’re Going to Court, I used the following example as a type of response I see as a Discovery Referee: Responding party hereby incorporates its general objections as if fully stated herein. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 8:40 am
Accordingly, you will want to consider a name that either describes your products or services (for example, "United Parcel Service"), one that is suggestive of your products or services (for example, "Greyhound Lines" or "Microsoft") or even a name that is coined, arbitrary or fanciful (for example, "Apple" or "Xerox"). [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
The following case is published below with my own commentary added in the blue fields. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 2:35 pm
FLORES, Appellee. 3rd District.Insurance -- Windstorm -- Authority of agent to bind insurer -- Where insurance application clearly provided, on page two, actual notice of limitations on insurance agent's authority to bind the insurer; applicant did not receive page two of application, but a printed line directly above the signature line on page one of application stated, “I further understand and agree to the terms as set forth on page 2”; and applicant's… [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:00 pm
Greyhound Lines, Inc.,817 F.2d 1182, 1185 (5th Cir. 1987). [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 12:20 pm
We unanimously reject our old case-by-case finality standard and adopt a bright-line rule that a dismissal of all claims is final unless the district court expressly grants leave to amend. [read post]
